On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 09:52:00PM +, Joel Rabinovitch wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>We have recently modified our application to work with PostgreSQL
>databases and schemas. We also support Oracle and SQL Server Databases.
[skipped]
>
>As a result, we have hit an issue where we n
Postgres will not build on AIX with either of the following options to the
configure script:
--with-uuid=e2fs
--with-uuid=ossp
so I was using --with-uuid=bsd which does work except for the arc4random
undefined symbol error I was getting.
I removed the --with-uuid=bsd option to the configure scr
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 05:04:30PM +0100, Nitesh Nathani wrote:
> Trying to achieve sync streaming to barman server and i need to add an
> entry to postgresql.conf for this parameter, which already has an entry and
> tried a few variations but does not work. Any ideas? Also tried '&&' but in
> vain
> x...@thebuild.com wrote:
>
> Isn't one of the reasons for the savepoint (in fact, the principal reason) to
> reset the connection back to non-error state so that execution can continue?
> In that case, it really does need to create the savepoint at the start of the
> block, regardless of what
On 6/13/22 2:52 PM, Joel Rabinovitch wrote:
Hi,
We have recently modified our application to work with PostgreSQL
databases and schemas. We also support Oracle and SQL Server Databases.
Along with adding support for PostgreSQL, we have upgraded our
infrastructure such that all environments a
Hi,
We have recently modified our application to work with PostgreSQL databases and
schemas. We also support Oracle and SQL Server Databases.
Along with adding support for PostgreSQL, we have upgraded our infrastructure
such that all environments are configured to use the UTC time zone. Previou
> On Jun 12, 2022, at 23:07, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> The lazy implementation theoretically can be possible, but why?
Isn't one of the reasons for the savepoint (in fact, the principal reason) to
reset the connection back to non-error state so that execution can continue?
In that case, it rea
po 13. 6. 2022 v 21:02 odesílatel Bryn Llewellyn napsal:
> *pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:*
>
> *b...@yugabyte.com napsal:*
>
> Does the “Tip” call-out box, from which the “Subject” here is copied, and
> the larger story that I copied below, apply even when the executable
> section of the block
Bryn Llewellyn writes:
> OK, so I'm obliged to answer.
> Because SQL rests on the principle that you just say *what* you want but
> not *how*.
It also rests on the principle that the programmer shouldn't be too
concerned about micro-efficiencies. You've given a perfectly good
six-line implementa
> pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> b...@yugabyte.com napsal:
>>
>> Does the “Tip” call-out box, from which the “Subject” here is copied, and
>> the larger story that I copied below, apply even when the executable section
>> of the block statement in question does nothing at all that could be
Hi Team,
Does anybody tried to have a look at it and would like to suggest any
optimisations?
Thanks
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 12:48 AM Shubham Mittal
wrote:
> Hi Team.
>
> *I have a use case to get the result as follows:*
>
> 1. asin_ymm is never null.
> 2. If there is more than 1 entry for an
11 matches
Mail list logo