Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:52:54PM +, Lu, Dan wrote:
>
> I am not sure if this is the right email group to ask about Open PostgreSQL
> Monitoring (https://opm.readthedocs.io/opm-core/index.html).
The correct place to ask question is one the github repositories, per
https://opm.readthedoc
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:54 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:17 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There is no bug here; it's operating as designed and documented.
> >> Maybe the docs need some refinement.
>
> > We should just say that ALTER FUNCTION ALTER DE
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:17 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> There is no bug here; it's operating as designed and documented.
>> Maybe the docs need some refinement.
> We should just say that ALTER FUNCTION ALTER DEPENDS ON makes the target
> function/procedure a (transient?)
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 7:30 PM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:17 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "David G. Johnston" writes:
>> > Maybe, but the behavior does exist but is bugged in its current state.
>> > Whether it is advisable for users to use this
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:17 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > Maybe, but the behavior does exist but is bugged in its current state.
> > Whether it is advisable for users to use this feature is immaterial, the
> > bug needs to be fixed so that is works as documented for those
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> Maybe, but the behavior does exist but is bugged in its current state.
> Whether it is advisable for users to use this feature is immaterial, the
> bug needs to be fixed so that is works as documented for those that choose
> to do so.
There is no bug here; it's opera
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 5:15 PM Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
>
> So I don't know what to believe.
>
Well, since the documentation supports what I was saying but the
implementation effectively supports what Adrian was saying this confusion
isn't surprising. The status quo is inconsistent and needs to
> david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> …and the documentation for ALTER FUNCTION should read "…as dependent on an
>> extension may be dropped when the extension is dropped".
>
> Nevermind this - if the extension is dropped the function will go away. Bu
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:42 AM Shaozhong SHI wrote:
> Given 2 or more such columns, is there any measure that can be calculated to
> tell which one alternates more than others?
Well, you could report non-flips as NULL and flips as magnitude, and
then wrap that query in another query to compute
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 21:20, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 9:11 AM Shaozhong SHI
> wrote:
> > How to calculate frequency of positive and negative numbers and define
> and calculate frequency of alteration of polarity?
> >
> > Surely, we can use frequency of alteration of polarit
On Thursday, 17 February 2022, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 9:11 AM Shaozhong SHI
> wrote:
> > How to calculate frequency of positive and negative numbers and define
> and calculate frequency of alteration of polarity?
> >
> > Surely, we can use frequency of alteration of polari
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 9:11 AM Shaozhong SHI wrote:
> How to calculate frequency of positive and negative numbers and define and
> calculate frequency of alteration of polarity?
>
> Surely, we can use frequency of alteration of polarity and level of change
> (e.g., size of positive and negative
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 2:14 PM celati Laurent
wrote:
>
>> ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA XXX GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO "user";
>
>
> Does a person know how to give privileges to a SuperUser role so that when
> he creates a new table, whether in the public schema or another schema, the
> tabl
Good morning,
I'm a superUser. I have defined different roles for several "simple" users.
They have rights for
read/select/use on any existing table. And also on any table that will be
generated in the future (DEFAULT PRIVILEGE).
Here is my method:
--FOR PUBLIC DIAGRAM
> GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA pu
Hello,
I am not sure if this is the right email group to ask about Open PostgreSQL
Monitoring (https://opm.readthedocs.io/opm-core/index.html). It appears there
is no update to this tool since at least 2019.
Since members from this email group has lots of expertise on PostgreSQL, I
thought I
How to calculate frequency of positive and negative numbers and define and
calculate frequency of alteration of polarity?
Surely, we can use frequency of alteration of polarity and level of change
(e.g., size of positive and negative numbers) to measure degree and
frequency of alteration.
Any ide
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:15 AM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> and the documentation for ALTER FUNCTION should read "...as dependent on
> an extension may be dropped when the extension is dropped".
>
Nevermind this - if the extension is dropped the function will go awa
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:04 AM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 2/17/22 08:52, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
> > **Briefly**
> >
>
> > *qu. 2.* Why does "drop extension restrict" quietly succeed—having the
> > effect of cascade-dropping any subprogram that you've altered to depend
> > on the extension in ques
Hi!
I am getting the following error when trying to PREPARE transaction
which updates both local and foreign table:
2/17/22 12:48:00:657 EST] 0128 RegisteredRes E WTRN0046E: An
attempt by the transaction manager to call prepare on a transactional
resource has resulted in an error. The
On 2022-Feb-17, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
> qu. 1. What is the use-case for "alter function/procedure depends on
> extension"?
Suppose you have an extension that implements change auditing for
tables, which works by creating triggers on the audited tables. You
enable auditing for specific tables by
On 2/17/22 08:52, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
**Briefly**
*qu. 2.* Why does "drop extension restrict" quietly succeed—having the
effect of cascade-dropping any subprogram that you've altered to depend
on the extension in question? This is at odds with the documented
meaning of "restrict".
But n
*Briefly*
qu. 1. What is the use-case for "alter function/procedure depends on extension"?
After all, subprograms depend, functionally, on all sorts of things. But
(unlike in Oracle Database) there’s (almost) no semantic check at “create” time
and therefore nothing like the semantics that ORCL’
AOn Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:27 AM Peter J. Holzer wrote
I don't think these explain the difference. I'd check whether the
postgresql binaries and all the the shared libraries are the same.
Or - since this only happens on the test system and not on the production
system - I'd just clone the p
Hi There,
Could someone shed some light on this error please? I am trying to set
up pgbouncer on a postgres Paas instance.
Regards
Vikas
On 2022-02-16 22:02:02 +0100, Carsten Klein wrote:
> On of the virtualized servers was created as a clone of the other one (using
> VMware to clone the VM). So, basically, these are very equal. Of course,
> they diverged over time.
>
> Focusing on PostgreSQL, here are the differences of postgresql
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 09:41 AM Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Carsten Klein schrieb am 16.02.2022 um 14:27:
Ah, man versteht sich :)
I'm using several (now unsupported) PostgreSQL 9.3.24 servers on
different (ancient) Ubuntu 14.04 LTS machines. On only one of those
servers, I get strange/wrong result
Carsten Klein schrieb am 16.02.2022 um 14:27:
> I'm using several (now unsupported) PostgreSQL 9.3.24 servers on
> different (ancient) Ubuntu 14.04 LTS machines. On only one of those
> servers, I get strange/wrong results when converting a string into a
> double value:
>
> SELECT 1.56::double preci
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 00:07 Gavan Schneider wrote:
Harking back to my long distant formative years I was taught to never ever rely
on equality tests when it came to floating point values. Nothing has changed in
this regard.
If binary exact is part of the requirement then the answer is I
28 matches
Mail list logo
