Eventually I found out. It is Nabble service.
--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 4:27 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jan-28, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> > I recollect there use to be a website from where one can reply from web.
>
> The community does not maintain such a service.
>
> There used to be a Gmane archive of this list that you could use to
> pos
On 2/14/21 5:37 PM, Ravi__Krishna wrote:
Eventually I found out. It is Nabble service.
I would search the --general archives for the problems with using Nabble
to post. Short version, you will get answers quicker(or at all) by not
using it.
--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.
On 14/02/2021 22:47, David Rowley wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 13:15, Seamus Abshere
wrote:
The comment from Robert says: (src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c)
/*
* If the use of parallel append is permitted, always request
at least
* lo
Hi David,
That is a great suggestion, except my partitions are foreign tables.
I wonder if I could figure out a single empty partition that’s just a normal
table... but I’m using hash partitioning, so I think I would lose a modulus.
Best,
Seamus
--
Seamus Abshere, SCEA
+1 (608) 772-0696
https:
hi,
Apologies for the self-replying, but I made it 700% faster by compiling from
source and forcing the parallel_workers from 7 to 96.
If this weren't a partitioned table, I could just do `alter table
test_3pd_cstore_partitioned set (parallel_workers = 96)` - but that isn't
currently supported
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 13:15, Seamus Abshere
wrote:
> The comment from Robert says: (src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c)
>
> /*
> * If the use of parallel append is permitted, always request
> at least
> * log2(# of children) workers.
>
> In my
