Greetings,
* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 2019-09-23 10:25, Vikas Sharma wrote:
> > I am wondering which one is the best way to archive the xlogs for Backup
> > and Recovery - pg_receivexlog or archive_command.
>
> I recommend using pg_receivexlog. It has two i
Greetings,
* Vikas Sharma (shavi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I am wondering which one is the best way to archive the xlogs for Backup
> and Recovery - pg_receivexlog or archive_command.
>
> pg_receivexlog seems best suited because the copied/archived file is
> streamed as it is being written to in xlo
Hey all,
Here’s a question I’ve been asking for a while and just can’t find an
answer to, so I thought I’d ask it here. The answer could be subjective,
but here goes...
When a web app connects to Postgres via a connection pooler, what is the
best way to manage privileges for the connecting user?
Hi Tom,
Just thinking about this further, there are other areas where Postgres
(correctly, IMO) deviates from the SQL spec and clarifies that in the docs.
For example,
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-NUMERIC-DECIMAL
states that for a NUMERIC with no precision
On 10/1/19 8:49 AM, Mike Roest wrote:
Thanks for the reply Tom,
We're going to look at removing the filtering on the pg_restore
which I think should allow us to move forward since we have the pg_dump
already filtered.
It will. If you want to verify do:
pg_restore -f testschema.txt test.b
On 10/1/19 7:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Roest writes:
Just trying to find out if something is intended behaviour. When doing a
schema filtered pg_dump the created dump file includes the grants on that
specific schema (in our case a grant usage to a unprivleged user) but doing
a pg_restore
Currently PostgresSQL 11.x can be installed on openSUSE 15 via the Postgres
channel. When will SLES 15 itself will be supported?
Thanks
Steve
Thanks for the reply Tom,
We're going to look at removing the filtering on the pg_restore which I
think should allow us to move forward since we have the pg_dump already
filtered.
--Mike
Mike Roest writes:
>Just trying to find out if something is intended behaviour. When doing a
> schema filtered pg_dump the created dump file includes the grants on that
> specific schema (in our case a grant usage to a unprivleged user) but doing
> a pg_restore with a -n does not restore that
On 9/30/19 9:21 AM, Marco Ippolito wrote:
Hi Adrian,
important update.
After adding in fabric-ca-server-config.yaml
ca:
# Name of this CA
name: fabric_ca
# Key file (is only used to import a private key into BCCSP)
keyfile: /etc/ssl/private/fabric_ca.key
# Certificate file (defau
Hi There,
Just trying to find out if something is intended behaviour. When doing a
schema filtered pg_dump the created dump file includes the grants on that
specific schema (in our case a grant usage to a unprivleged user) but doing
a pg_restore with a -n does not restore that grant however
ind
Does the pg_stat_statements.total_time include the time it takes for all
fetches of a cursor query. Or is it only the db time taken to execute the
query?
--
Regards,
Ayub
Hello.
At Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:42:24 +0530, Sonam Sharma wrote in
> We have a query which is running slow and it's taking 26secs to complete..
> we have run the analyzer also and it's taking the same time.
>
> Any tool is there for query optimization or any suggestions.
EXPLAIN ANALYZE (not jus
Re: Devrim Gündüz 2019-09-30
<21705bb57210f01b559ec2f5de8550df586324e2.ca...@gunduz.org>
> I think postgresql-contrib-py3 is really the best idea at this point,
> otherwise
> I cannot see a clean way to make this without breaking existing installations.
Users of these (now contrib) modules need
We have a query which is running slow and it's taking 26secs to complete..
we have run the analyzer also and it's taking the same time.
Any tool is there for query optimization or any suggestions.
My query plan looks like this :
CTE Scan on approvalwflscreen (cost=8736.21..8737.25 rows=52 width=
15 matches
Mail list logo