> On 25/05/2023 06:52 CEST Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 21:10 +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > > On 24/05/2023 15:46 CEST Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > >
> > > Personally, I think it should read cartesian product because cross
> > > product is
> > > an overloaded term and cartesian pr
On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 08:59 +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > Since we are talking about Cartesian products: is the term "Cartesian join"
> > used anywhere?
>
> Not in the docs:
I was trying to be funny. The Cartesian product of {Cartesian,cross} and
{product,join} would be {Cartesian product,Cart
> On 25/05/2023 23:46 CEST Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 08:59 +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > > Since we are talking about Cartesian products: is the term "Cartesian
> > > join"
> > > used anywhere?
> >
> > Not in the docs:
>
> I was trying to be funny. The Cartesian product of
