The use "Postgres" in docs

2023-03-14 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I think we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any objections to this? -- Daniel Gustafsson postgres_title.diff Description: Binary data

Re: The use "Postgres" in docs

2023-03-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2023-Mar-14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I think > we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any objections to > this? Both are very new. No objection to the change. -- Álvaro HerreraBreisgau, Deutsc

Re: The use "Postgres" in docs

2023-03-14 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 3/14/23 7:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: On 2023-Mar-14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I think we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any objections to this? Both are very new. No objection to the change. +1

Re: The use "Postgres" in docs

2023-03-14 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 14 Mar 2023, at 13:55, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > On 3/14/23 7:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> On 2023-Mar-14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I >>> think >>> we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any obje

Nulls Not Distinct in Unique Indexes secton

2023-03-14 Thread Kirk Parker
The Unique Indexes section ( https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/indexes-unique.html) does not mention the new NULLS [ NOT ] DISTINCT capability of indexes ( https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-createindex.html), and it probably should. Specifically, it has the exact wording from previous versio