On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 5:20 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Hi Hussein,
>
> Apologies for the very delayed response. I'm aware that you've taken
> an interest in this subject as part of your YouTube channel. Thanks
> for publicizing the work!
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 7:14 PM PG Doc comments form
>
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> Maybe a bit more explicitness is in order.
Yeah, maybe.
> On the point of "will generally need to coexist" - I don't see why we are
> being wishy-washy here, though.
Because sometimes it will take a relatively long time (say in the
pres
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:29 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> > Maybe a bit more explicitness is in order.
>
> Yeah, maybe.
>
> > On the point of "will generally need to coexist" - I don't see why we
> are being wishy-washy here, though.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:06 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> Ok, so the "most recent live tuple" - this in an update, there has to be one.
> Can that live tuple that is being updated ever be removed by this process?
No.
> I'm not sure what the long-running transaction has to do with this though -
