Hi
pá 30. 7. 2021 v 0:24 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 01:45:12PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/ddl-partitioning.html
> > Description:
> >
>
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype-numeric.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype-numeric.html says that the range
of a numeric type integer is -2147483648 to +2147483647 but
PGTYPESnumeric_t
OK, I'll put something for you to review. Most programmers simply ignore
locking and wonder why it sometimes goes wrong.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:22 PM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 8:44 PM Anthony Berglas
> wrote:
>
>> My point is that while
My point is that while I can follow the academic style discussion, most of
my colleagues could not. They just need to have a clear idea of how to
handle the common case, which is to use a database using some programming
language.
Early on, for Read Committed, it should discuss and ideally provide
Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 23:07 +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>> Done at the proposed pages - and a few more.
> Looks good to me - changed to "ready for committer".
Pushed with a bit of editorialization:
* I removed the glossary entry for "Domain (Internet)". AFAICS we
have not
Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 13:24 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 14:26 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>>> If I understand correctly, it would be helpful to add this sentence or a
>>> corrected version of it: "Triggers always execute in the same transaction
