Hi Jürgen,
ok if you say so. But as "" may be understood as "../.." with a
forgotten slash, I would suggest to choose for instance "<...>" which is
best known and understood to be replaced by whatever.
And another thing more general, the tutorial suggest to compile something
with "*make*" the
> On 14 May 2020, at 04:17, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> While working with TLS I noticed that the password callback definition had an
>> extra newline in the programlisting in the docs. Since the
>> has been indented with the
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/ddl-constraints.html
Description:
I think the information about the "order of execution" when checking CHECK
constraints when inserting or updating records is missing in the
documentation
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 2:30 AM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/ddl-constraints.html
> Description:
>
> I think the information about the "order of execution" when checking CHECK
> cons
On 2020-05-14 03:07, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 05:17:43PM +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
in my opinion it's a little unclear what "or default" means at the
end,
because the comma is used to separate enumeration elements ("d =
default
<...>, n = nothing, f = all columns, i
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:38:09AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 14 May 2020, at 04:17, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> With everything I found on top of your stuff, I finish with the
>> attached. Does it look fine to you?
>
> +1, thanks for picking it up!
Thanks, I have applied the previous v
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:30:38PM +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> Perhaps it will be useful for some users to know that relreplident = i does
> not mean that the required index exists (as in default case)?..
Yeah, that feels incomplete and I think that it would be good to close
the gap here, as
