On 5/28/18 13:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:55:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>>> I think that last part isn't actually written down anywhere. (It only
>>> states the converse.) How about a clarification like this:
>>
>>> @@ -271,7 +271,10 @@ Note
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> I think we should still add the second part, because it currently
> doesn't say anything about that a cursor declaration might fail if an
> updatable cursor cannot be created.
I still think it wouldn't add anything. Any other error in the command
would cause the cursor
