On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:56:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> 2018-03-09 0:10 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form :
> > From testing, it seems like PostgreSQL supports the syntax "IS NOT DOCUMENT"
> > in addition to "IS DOCUMENT", similar to "IS NOT NULL", "IS NOT FALSE", etc,
> > however this does n
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:17:04AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> 2018-03-11 1:43 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form :
> > The documentation for the varbit data type is missing the size parameter "[
> > (n) ]".
> >
> Good catch! It seems to be an oversight in commit
> 768b647ead78d0d63915c1708cad13c2468
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:17:04AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > 2018-03-11 1:43 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form :
> > > The documentation for the varbit data type is missing the size
> parameter "[
> > > (n) ]".
> > >
> > Good catch! It se
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:17:04AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > 2018-03-11 1:43 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form :
> > > The documentation for the varbit data
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:17:04AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > > 2018-03-11 1:43 GMT-03:00 PG Doc
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 06:28:15PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I am always debating how important it is to backpatck vs the churn
> we require of translations of our docs. In this case, it didn't seem
> worthwhile to have
On Friday, March 30, 2018, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I looked at this patch and thought it was more a stylistic item rather
> than a correction. Is that right?
>
Looks like a syntax bug fix to me - especially since it is a reference
table. Those should be back-patched.
David J.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:31:07AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Friday, March 30, 2018, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I looked at this patch and thought it was more a stylistic item rather
> than a correction. Is that right?
>
>
> Looks like a syntax bug fix to me - especially since
