On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:44:09AM -0400, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Right, following the rules defined internally by ChooseRelationName()
> when creating the new/old indexes in the process. So this could be
> added. Would you like to suggest a rewording of this sentence for the
> extra number opti
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 06:12:54PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following paragraph:
> "If the index marked INVALID is suffixed ccnew, then it corresponds to the
> transient index created during the concurrent operation, and the recommended
> recovery method is to drop it using DROP IND
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-reindex.html
Description:
The following paragraph:
"If the index marked INVALID is suffixed ccnew, then it corresponds to the
transient index created during the concurrent operation, a
