Re: client auth docs seem to have devolved

On 2019-Dec-19, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Concretely, I propose the attached. Anybody want to editorialize on > > my short descriptions of the auth methods? > > Pushed after a bit more fiddling with the wording. Looks good, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant

Re: client auth docs seem to have devolved

I wrote: > Concretely, I propose the attached. Anybody want to editorialize on > my short descriptions of the auth methods? Pushed after a bit more fiddling with the wording. regards, tom lane

Re: client auth docs seem to have devolved

I wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> This was changed by Peter in >> commit 56811e57323faa453947eb82f007e323a952e1a1 along with the >> restructuring. It used to say "the following subsections". So techically I >> think that change is correct, but that doesn't necessarily make it helpful. >> But b