On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 15:03 +0100, David Fiedler wrote:
> I've stumbled across a code that used this condition, resulting in unexpected
> behavior.
> I think it worths a note that catching 0 is not possible and that it
> results in a catch all handler.
> What do you think? Should I post the e
David Fiedler writes:
> I've stumbled across a code that used this condition, resulting in
> unexpected behavior. I think it worths a note that catching 0 is not
> possible and that it results in a catch all handler.
Hmph. The code thinks
* OTHERS is represented as code 0 (which wo
Hi,
I've stumbled across a code that used this condition, resulting in
unexpected behavior. I think it worths a note that catching 0 is not
possible and that it results in a catch all handler.
What do you think? Should I post the expected text somewhere?
Thanks,
David Fiedler
--
*David Fied
