On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 12:11 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Sprinkled in some of David's suggestions, and pushed.
Thanks; your text is great.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
On 18.01.24 22:21, David G. Johnston wrote:
I started looking at this specific item and immediately got the idea to
actually document in user-facing (i.e., not system catalogs) what these
object categories are in which object types share the schema namespace.
The "Other Object Types" section al
On 26.01.24 16:52, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 19:01 +0530, vignesh C wrote:
CFBot shows that the patch does not apply anymore as in [1]:
There was a conflict with 46a0cd4cefb.
Updated version attached.
Sprinkled in some of David's suggestions, and pushed.
I was hesitant to bu
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 19:01 +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> CFBot shows that the patch does not apply anymore as in [1]:
There was a conflict with 46a0cd4cefb.
Updated version attached.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From 193d6d6c20f0c2976e0b63f1896978545def3fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 3:46 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> In the attached patch, I have copied the enumeration of relations from
> the CREATE INDEX page. I think this small redundance is alright, but I
> wouldn't mind if this gets removed from CREATE INDEX.
>
>
Tweaking the main paragraph a little.
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 16:16, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 15:54 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 27.11.23 03:30, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > True; I don't find it documented that all objects in pg_class share a
> > > namespace and that constraints are implemented by indexes of
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 15:54 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 27.11.23 03:30, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > True; I don't find it documented that all objects in pg_class share a
> > namespace and that constraints are implemented by indexes of the same
> > name. But I think that the first part is a pro
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 7:54 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
>
> I find the specific change
> proposal for ddl.sgml a bit weird, though, because this is a very
> introductory section, and you are referring people to pg_class (what is
> that?!?) for details. If we want to put something there, it shoul
On 27.11.23 03:30, Laurenz Albe wrote:
True; I don't find it documented that all objects in pg_class share a
namespace and that constraints are implemented by indexes of the same
name. But I think that the first part is a property of schemas and had
better be documented there.
It is documented
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:30 AM Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> What do you think of the attached patch?
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
looks good to me.
On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 08:00 +0800, jian he wrote:
> Hi. minor doc issue.
> create table s1(a int, constraint s2 PRIMARY key (a));
> create table s2(a int);
> ERROR: relation "s2" already exists
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createtable.html#SQL-CREATETABLE-PARMS-UNIQUE
> maybe f
11 matches
Mail list logo
