Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:09:39PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > If we are going to change it, the minimum value is apparently 0, not > 2. Ditto. I misread guc.c. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi all, We do document the range for some parameters: - bgwriter_flush_after: "The valid range is between 0, which disables forced writeback, and 2MB." - effective_io_concurrency (integer): "The allowed range is 1 to 1000, or zero to disable issuance of asynchronous I/O requests."

Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:27:13AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> The server has an undocumented maximum value of 10 for >> bgwriter_lru_multiplier, and will fail to start if it's set higher than >> this: > Any opinions from others? I don't think it's generally o

Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:27:13AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The server has an undocumented maximum value of 10 for > bgwriter_lru_multiplier, and will fail to start if it's set higher than > this: > > LOG: 20 is outside the valid range for parameter "bgwriter_lru_multiplier" > (0 .. 1