> On 13 Nov 2023, at 12:20, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2023-Nov-13, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> That's a fair point. It's sort of hard to refer back from the acronym list
>> though since we don't have a single Access Method section but instead one for
>> Indexes and one for Relations. In
On 2023-Nov-13, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> That's a fair point. It's sort of hard to refer back from the acronym list
> though since we don't have a single Access Method section but instead one for
> Indexes and one for Relations. In the attached diff I propose that we add a
> glossary entry for
> On 12 Nov 2023, at 00:08, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/acronyms.html
> Description:
>
> while reading the progres codebase, i could find you're using the acronym
> "AM" which de
