On 2019-04-26 09:41, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Those options are Linux-specific -- maybe just say so?
committed with that change
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:17 PM Joe Conway wrote:
> On 4/24/19 4:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 2019-04-23 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> >>> On 2019-04-23 16:15, Joe Conway wrote:
> I don't think so. Not sure if you have an account at Red Hat, but this
>
On 4/24/19 4:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-04-23 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>>> On 2019-04-23 16:15, Joe Conway wrote:
I don't think so. Not sure if you have an account at Red Hat, but this
ticket covers it:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4819
On 2019-04-23 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> On 2019-04-23 16:15, Joe Conway wrote:
>>> I don't think so. Not sure if you have an account at Red Hat, but this
>>> ticket covers it:
>>> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/48199
>
>> That discusses the equally-named export opt
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2019-04-23 16:15, Joe Conway wrote:
>> I don't think so. Not sure if you have an account at Red Hat, but this
>> ticket covers it:
>> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/48199
> That discusses the equally-named export options on the NFS server, not
> the mount option
On 2019-04-23 16:15, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 4/23/19 9:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2019-04-23 14:31, Joe Conway wrote:
>>> Looks like you dropped the advice WRT the asynchronous mount option.
>>> Isn't that is still relevant?
>>
>> I don't think that advice was correct. An async mounted NF
On 4/23/19 9:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-04-23 14:31, Joe Conway wrote:
>> Looks like you dropped the advice WRT the asynchronous mount option.
>> Isn't that is still relevant?
>
> I don't think that advice was correct. An async mounted NFS file system
> will flush data on fsync, whi
On 2019-04-23 14:31, Joe Conway wrote:
> Looks like you dropped the advice WRT the asynchronous mount option.
> Isn't that is still relevant?
I don't think that advice was correct. An async mounted NFS file system
will flush data on fsync, which is what one wants.
--
Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-04-23 13:00, Martín Marqués wrote:
> Didn''t read the proposed patch, but would like to point out that I
> would also add that it has to be mounted without file attribute caching.
Why?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remo
On 4/23/19 6:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Attached is a patch that rewrites the section on NFS. The old section
> was ancient and didn't seem very helpful.
>
> AFAIK, the only strict requirement for using NFS with PostgreSQL is the
> hard mount. Anything else we should mention?
>
> I also r
El 23/4/19 a las 07:10, Peter Eisentraut escribió:
> Attached is a patch that rewrites the section on NFS. The old section
> was ancient and didn't seem very helpful.
>
> AFAIK, the only strict requirement for using NFS with PostgreSQL is the
> hard mount. Anything else we should mention?
Didn'
11 matches
Mail list logo
