On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 13:06 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Hmpf. The documentation should always be in sync with the code, right?
> > So I think it should be left alone in HEAD, and if the checksum change
> > gets reverted, your patch should be applied to HEAD.
>
> I see your point, and I now ag
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 01:42:09PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 07:00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
> > > > index 52b5b8f793b..705ca682777 100644
> > > > --- a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
> > > > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/wal
On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 07:00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
> > > index 52b5b8f793b..705ca682777 100644
> > > --- a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
> > > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
> > > @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 08:25:56AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 11:38 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:00:10PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/checksums.html
> > >
> > > I think that the first sentenc
On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 11:38 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:00:10PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/checksums.html
> >
> > I think that the first sentence of the second paragraph in this page is a
> > little bit misleading. T
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:00:10PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/checksums.html
> Description:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I think that the first sentence of the second paragraph in this
