On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 11:13 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, the arxiv.org copy claims it appeared in "Making Databases Work",
> so that's how I cited it in the proposed patch. Is that wrong?
> Perhaps it was published twice?
No, you have it right, I confused myself with the subtitle.
https://www.ama
Thomas Munro writes:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:40 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> I happened to come across this:
>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.01973
> Just by the way, for anyone interested, that paper appeared as a
> chapter in a book "The Pragmatic Wisdom of Michael Stonebraker".
Hmm, the arxiv.org c
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:40 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> I happened to come across this:
>
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.01973
>
> I found this to be really interesting reading,
Just by the way, for anyone interested, that paper appeared as a
chapter in a book "The Pragmatic Wisdom of Michael Stonebraker"
> On 4 Jul 2024, at 22:22, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 4 Jul 2024, at 07:40, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I happened to come across this:
>>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.01973
>>> I found this to be really interesting reading, so I wonder if
>>> we shouldn't cite it in history.sgm
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> On 4 Jul 2024, at 07:40, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I happened to come across this:
>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.01973
>> I found this to be really interesting reading, so I wonder if
>> we shouldn't cite it in history.sgml or some such place.
> It's a really good read, +1 f
> On 4 Jul 2024, at 17:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> Unrelated to that, but reading history.sgml I found this sentend at the end
>> of
>> the page to be sort of misleading:
>
>> "Details about what has happened in PostgreSQL since then can be found
>> in Appendix E."
>
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> Unrelated to that, but reading history.sgml I found this sentend at the end of
> the page to be sort of misleading:
> "Details about what has happened in PostgreSQL since then can be found
> in Appendix E."
> While technically true, it seems a bit overprom
> On 4 Jul 2024, at 07:40, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I happened to come across this:
>
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.01973
>
> I found this to be really interesting reading, so I wonder if
> we shouldn't cite it in history.sgml or some such place.
It's a really good read, +1 for referencing it in his
