On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 08:34, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Not harmful, but an acronym which we explain with the acronym itself doesn't
> seem like helpful use of page real-estate.
>
Perhaps I am missing something. The two acronyms offered appear to be:
"global information tracker": you're in a go
you mean something like Gnu s Not Unix ?
Marc MILLAS
Senior Architect
+33607850334
www.mokadb.com
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 3:34 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 10 Jun 2021, at 15:03, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> >
> > On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >> Commit 651377933e031 clea
> On 10 Jun 2021, at 15:03, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
> On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with Git.
>> Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as Git
>> isn't an acronym (but CVS is, hence
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 09:04, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with
> Git.
> > Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as
> Git
> > isn't an acronym (but CVS is,
On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with Git.
> Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as Git
> isn't an acronym (but CVS is, hence the original item replaced). We also
> never
> refer to Git