Re: Git is not an acronym

2021-06-10 Thread Douglas A. Whitfield
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 08:34, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Not harmful, but an acronym which we explain with the acronym itself doesn't > seem like helpful use of page real-estate. > Perhaps I am missing something. The two acronyms offered appear to be: "global information tracker": you're in a go

Re: Git is not an acronym

2021-06-10 Thread Marc Millas
you mean something like Gnu s Not Unix ? Marc MILLAS Senior Architect +33607850334 www.mokadb.com On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 3:34 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 10 Jun 2021, at 15:03, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > > > On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > >> Commit 651377933e031 clea

Re: Git is not an acronym

2021-06-10 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 10 Jun 2021, at 15:03, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with Git. >> Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as Git >> isn't an acronym (but CVS is, hence

Re: Git is not an acronym

2021-06-10 Thread Dave Cramer
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 09:04, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with > Git. > > Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as > Git > > isn't an acronym (but CVS is,

Re: Git is not an acronym

2021-06-10 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with Git. > Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as Git > isn't an acronym (but CVS is, hence the original item replaced). We also > never > refer to Git