On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 10:57 +, Oliver Marienfeld wrote:
> I would understand if you decided against extending the docs.
I don't get to decide that.
If you come up with a patch for the documentation, that would
increase the chances that the documentation actually gets changed.
Yours,
Laurenz
This page isn't relevant to the discussion at hand as it doesn't have anything
to do with large objects. Whether it should would be a different complaint.
Thanks for pointing this out. I picked the wrong page.
When deleting a row that references (contains) a large object, I think that
most us
On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 13:48 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-binary.html
>
> When deleting a row that references (contains) a large object, I think that
> most users expect the DBMS to take care of the, now unreferenced, BLOB. It's
> good to kn
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 AM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
You may be onto something, but:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-binary.html
This page isn't relevant to the discussion at hand as it doesn't have
anything to do with large objects. Whether it should would be a d
> On 12/06/2023 15:48 CEST PG Doc comments form wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-binary.html
> Description:
>
> When deleting a row that references (contains) a large object, I think that
> most use
