Thank you for your answer.
I am convinced.
Thank you for replying to my question in poor English.
2022年12月3日(土) 23:19 Tom Lane :
> Laurenz Albe writes:
> > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 08:54 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> >> I am thinking that the value of the ROUND function with NUMERIC as an
>
Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 08:54 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> I am thinking that the value of the ROUND function with NUMERIC as an
>> argument is rounded off, not rounded away from zero.
> It is rounded away from zero, since 43 is farther away from 0 than 42.5.
> This
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 08:54 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Explanation of the manual's ROUND function
> round ( numeric ) → numeric
> round ( double precision ) → double precision
> Rounds to nearest integer. For numeric, ties are broken by rounding away
> from zero. For double precision, the
