>> Ok, I will remove the comment in all supported branches (after next
>> minor releases are out). Patch attached.
>
> +1. Looks fine to me.
Done.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:45:49AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>> I think it's a safe bet at this point that that feature isn't ever
>> coming back, so I'd be good with ripping out the whole para.
>
> Ok, I will remove the comment in all supported branches (after next
> min
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>> There's a comment beginning with:
>>
>> in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
>> Do we need to keep this?
>
> Well, the point is that the whole para after that is commented out.
Yes, so my question was we could safely remove the whole
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> There's a comment beginning with:
>
> in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
> Do we need to keep this?
Well, the point is that the whole para after that is commented out.
The para in question seems to have shown up in 20a071326, and
at t
