=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera writes:
> How about the attached patch?
Instead of
+ Causes the possibly schema-qualified named index to become attached
I think something like
+ Causes the named index (possibly schema-qualified) to become attached
would be more readable and closer t
Hello Alvaro,
On 2024-Oct-18, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-alterindex.html
> Description:
>
> I am trying to find out whether the syntax `ALTER INDEX name ATTACH
> PARTITION ind
On 2024-04-02 16:40 +0200, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-altertable.html
> Description:
>
> It is not entirely clear (to me) that ALTER TABLE statements with
> comma-separated sub-
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 8:56 AM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> When the folloing SQL is executed:
> ALTER TABLE "table" ALTER COLUMN "id" SET RESTART WITH nnn raises error
> then an error is returned:
>
Yes, because if you take the RESTART branch in the syntax there is no word
SET preceding RESTA
On 2021-Oct-26, nikolai.berkoff wrote:
> Thank you, this reads better.
> Is there a reason in the docs there is sometimes
>
> ANALYZE
>
> and sometimes only
>
> ANALYZE
> ? I prefer the link if there is no hard rule.
I pushed this on November 5th; it is commit
df80f9da5c6541e744eeb20eac
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 19th, 2021 at 16:16, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> I would put it in a separate one instead, as in the attached.
Thank you, this reads better.
Is there a reason in the docs there is sometimes
ANALYZE
and sometimes only
ANALYZE
? I prefer
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Oct-19, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:15:59PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > > I agree that it might surprise an user and it would be good to document
> > > it.
> > > However, it does not belong to the d
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:16:44PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dunno, putting it in the middle of the existing paragraph looks odd to
> me. I would put it in a separate one instead, as in the attached.
Fine by me. Thanks!
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2021-Oct-19, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:15:59PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > I agree that it might surprise an user and it would be good to document it.
> > However, it does not belong to the description. I would add it to the Notes
> > section at the end of the ALTE
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:15:59PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> I agree that it might surprise an user and it would be good to document it.
> However, it does not belong to the description. I would add it to the Notes
> section at the end of the ALTER TABLE page.
No objections to the suggested ad
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, at 6:03 AM, nikolai.berkoff wrote:
> The current documentation does not mention that the column statistics are
> removed which I can see they are in src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
>
> ATExecAlterColumnType
> /*
> * Drop any pg_statistic entry for the column, since it's now
On Sunday, April 25, 2021, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
>
> I use postgresql 12.6. I want to restart my sequence something like that:
> alter sequence quiz_seq restart with ((select max(id) from quiz)+1);
> but I can't do it. Please, clarify. Can I use only plain numbers like
> that?
alter seque
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:22:25AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >> One can argue whether those bulletpoints are sufficient for stressing the
> >> importance, but it's at least mentioned. There is however no mention of
> >> postgresql.auto.conf which clearly isn't helping anyone, so we should
> On 25 Aug 2020, at 21:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 14 Jul 2020, at 01:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>> I am creating a new thread to discuss the question raised by Alvaro of
>>> how many ALTER SYSTEM settings are lost
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 14 Jul 2020, at 01:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I am creating a new thread to discuss the question raised by Alvaro of
> > how many ALTER SYSTEM settings are lost during major upgrades. Do we
> > properly document that u
> On 14 Jul 2020, at 01:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am creating a new thread to discuss the question raised by Alvaro of
> how many ALTER SYSTEM settings are lost during major upgrades. Do we
> properly document that users should migrate their postgresql.conf _and_
> postgresql.auto.conf files
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 04:26:57PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> I believe the documentation page
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/sql-altertable.html is missing the action
> ADD CONSTRAINT, as it is mentioned in the descriptions of other keywords.
The documentation includes this descri
=?utf-8?q?PG_Doc_comments_form?= writes:
> I found that the alter server statement below does not work:
> ALTER SERVER foo OPTIONS (host 'foo', dbname 'foodb');
> but this does:
> ALTER SERVER foo OPTIONS (set host 'foo', set dbname 'foodb');
Hm, define "does not work". Those aren't equivalent:
On Wednesday, May 2, 2018, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/tutorial-sql.html
> Description:
>
> where is ALTER?
>
Command reference. Part VI, Chapter I
https://www.postgresql.
19 matches
Mail list logo
