On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:49 AM tanghy.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 2:42 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >I was looking at this thread, and please note that there is no need to
> >do anything here as the WAL prefetch has been reverted for now as of
> >c2dc1934.
>
> Thanks for
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 2:42 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>I was looking at this thread, and please note that there is no need to
>do anything here as the WAL prefetch has been reverted for now as of
>c2dc1934.
Thanks for the updating. Got it.
Regards,
Tang
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:48:27AM +, tanghy.f...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Indeed, column added. Thanks.
I was looking at this thread, and please note that there is no need to
do anything here as the WAL prefetch has been reverted for now as of
c2dc1934.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PG
On Friday, April 30, 2021 12:38 PM, Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰
wrote
>I noticed one more thing.
>It seems the column " stats_reset | timestamp with time zone " is not
>listed in the pg_stat_prefetch_recovery view.
>Should we add this column too ?
Indeed, column added. Thanks.
Regards,
Tang
0001-p
> When reading the manual doc, I found an inconsistent representation style for
> the newly added pg_stat_prefetch_recovery view in PG14 at [1].
> Same problem seems to be reported by Noriyoshi Shinoda who also proposed
> a patch to fix the problem at[2].
> I tried to fix the problem in a way diffe
