Thank you for responding.
*Best regards,*
*Steve Maio*
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" writes:
> >> On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, PG Doc comments form <
> nore...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> >> Should this not read :
> >> psql-f outfile postgres
>
> > Technic
"Jonathan S. Katz" writes:
>> On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, PG Doc comments form
>> wrote:
>> Should this not read :
>> psql-f outfile postgres
> Technically it is correct: you’re dumping data to an output file,
> and reading the data in from an input file. The documentation
> also makes refere
Hi,
> On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, PG Doc comments form
> wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/backup-dump.html
> Description:
>
> "The basic usage of this comma
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/backup-dump.html
Description:
"The basic usage of this command is:
pg_dumpall > outfile
The resulting dump can be restored with psql:
psql -f infile postgres
(Actually,
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/app-pg-dumpall.html
Description:
The example to dumb all databases at the bottom of the page "pg_dumpall
>
db.out" works, but I think it would be better to suggest &q
