Re: Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1.

2024-06-28 Thread David G. Johnston
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:41 PM David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The attached patch moves this paragraph there. I distilled the paragraph > down to its essence, but am open to being a bit more wordy, and consider > more how this fits into the existing content of that pag

Re: Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1.

2024-02-02 Thread David G. Johnston
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:19 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 23 Jan 2024, at 21:43, David G. Johnston > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:30 PM PG Doc comments form < > nore...@postgresql.org > wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logge

Re: Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1.

2024-01-24 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 23 Jan 2024, at 21:43, David G. Johnston > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:30 PM PG Doc comments form > wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html

Re: Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1.

2024-01-23 Thread David G. Johnston
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:30 PM PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html > Description: > > I noticed, that in section 26.3.6.1. it's not specified, what the -X > parame

Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1.

2024-01-23 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html Description: Hi! I'm reading through the documentation and so far I have to say this is the best documentation I have ever encountered, thank you! I noticed, tha