> On 27 Mar 2023, at 17:04, Randall Sindlinger wrote:
> Fantastic! I'm rather used to things just going off into the ether.
> I know I've
> seen minor things before, so next time I notice one, I'll send it in.
Please do, postgres is made by the community and no report is too small to be
valuabl
>On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 5:18 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > I'd suggest moving that last sentence to
> > immediately after the first sentence, which ends with "...when the database
> > is created."
>
> I think sentence with the link is better at the end, how about if we reword it
> slightly to
> On 25 Mar 2023, at 16:43, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The final sentence ("For more information refer to Section 24.3") is easily
> read to refer to more information being available about character code zero
> (NUL). However, section 24.3 has no mention of NUL, but rather the
> available dat
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-character.html
Description:
In the paragraph
> The characters that can be stored in any of these data types are
determined by the database character set, which is selected when
