On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:10 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 01:30:13AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > BTW, all current index entries point to the top of the pg_buffercache
> > docs. Would it be better if each entry pointed directly to its relevant
> > section using a zone att
On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 01:30:13AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> BTW, all current index entries point to the top of the pg_buffercache
> docs. Would it be better if each entry pointed directly to its relevant
> section using a zone attribute like this?
>
> -
> +
>pg_buffercache_summary
>
T
Hi,
While reading commit 8eede2c7200 and the pg_buffercache docs,
I noticed a few minor issues:
- There are missing index entries for pg_buffercache_numa() and
pg_buffercache_usage_counts(), even though other functions have them.
- The section titles for pg_buffercache_evict_relation and
pg_
