Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel writes:
> Em ter, 28 de ago de 2018 às 18:21, Tom Lane escreveu:
>> You could as well argue that every single page that describes creating
>> any sort of object ought to repeat this information. I doubt that people
>> would find that to be an improvement.
> I'll ne
Em ter, 28 de ago de 2018 às 18:21, Tom Lane escreveu:
> Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel writes:
> > It seems that naming prepared statements is limited to 63 characters as
> per
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYNTAX-IDENTIFIERS
>
> Yeah, just like
Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel writes:
> It seems that naming prepared statements is limited to 63 characters as per
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYNTAX-IDENTIFIERS
Yeah, just like every other SQL identifier in Postgres...
> The dangerous situation
Hello all
I just found a limitation in prepared statements names that I didn't know
before and can lead applications to be difficult to debug.
It seems that naming prepared statements is limited to 63 characters as per
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYN
