Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-09 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 2019-10-08 18:39, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I'm also at a loss as to why we're discussing what to call 'master/ > > master' here since we don't actually use the term 'master/master' in our > > docs at all today that I can

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-10-08 18:39, Stephen Frost wrote: > I'm also at a loss as to why we're discussing what to call 'master/ > master' here since we don't actually use the term 'master/master' in our > docs at all today that I can see. The underlying premise appears to be that the word should be banned. In wh

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-08 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I don't agree with this claim. While we could argue about if a hot > > standby is considered "active" or not, the vast majority of the world > > considers "active/active" to a

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-08 Thread Chris Travers
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 21:51 Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 10:49:54AM +1300, Mike Taves wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 10:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > With master/standby-replica-slave, it is clear what multi-master is, > and > > > what master/replica is. If you start using a

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 10:49:54AM +1300, Mike Taves wrote: > On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 10:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > With master/standby-replica-slave, it is clear what multi-master is, and > > what master/replica is. If you start using active-active, is it > > active/replica? The full choices a

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-06 Thread Mike Taves
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 10:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: > With master/standby-replica-slave, it is clear what multi-master is, and > what master/replica is. If you start using active-active, is it > active/replica? The full choices are: ... There are more choices. Coming from a different corner of c

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > I don't agree with this claim. While we could argue about if a hot > standby is considered "active" or not, the vast majority of the world > considers "active/active" to actually be where you can use the two > systems interchangably,

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:10 PM Jonathan S. Katz > wrote: > > On 10/2/19 7:39 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:57 PM Erikjan Rijkers > > > wrote: > > > > > > On 2019-10-02 12:46, Peter E

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:10 PM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 10/2/19 7:39 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:57 PM Erikjan Rijkers > > wrote: > > > > On 2019-10-02 12:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > On 2019-10-02 10:21, Magnus Hagander

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 10/2/19 7:39 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:57 PM Erikjan Rijkers > wrote: > > On 2019-10-02 12:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 2019-10-02 10:21, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> Exactly. Both might be accurate, but one comes with a

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Chris Travers
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:57 PM Erikjan Rijkers wrote: > On 2019-10-02 12:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 2019-10-02 10:21, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> Exactly. Both might be accurate, but one comes with a lot less > >> baggage. > >> > >> I support a search and replace. > >> > >> I think i

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Erikjan Rijkers
On 2019-10-02 12:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 2019-10-02 10:21, Magnus Hagander wrote: Exactly. Both might be accurate, but one comes with a lot less baggage. I support a search and replace.  I think it'll take a bit more than just a simple "sed script to replace", if that's what you me

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-10-02 10:21, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Exactly. Both might be accurate, but one comes with a lot less baggage. > > I support a search and replace.  > > I think it'll take a bit more than just a simple "sed script to > replace", if that's what you mean. But probably not all that much --

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:59 AM Selena Deckelmann wrote: Hi! > Whoa! That was a long time ago. Welcome back! :) Hi! On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:06 AM Stephen Frost wrote: > >> >> >> I know that I tend towards primary/replica when discussing physical >> replication, and we do that quite a bit

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-02 Thread Selena Deckelmann
Hi! On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:06 AM Stephen Frost wrote: > > > I know that I tend towards primary/replica when discussing physical > replication, and we do that quite a bit in the documentation (consider > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/warm-standby.html where we seem to be > pretty confused

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-10-01 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 2019-09-25 00:28, Dave Cramer wrote: > > Ya, I was under that impression as well.  > > > > Dave Cramer > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 18:18, Renee > > wrote: > > > > I was und

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-09-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-09-25 00:28, Dave Cramer wrote: > Ya, I was under that impression as well.  > > Dave Cramer > > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 18:18, Renee > wrote: > > I was under the impression that both terms were being deprecated. Is > that only the case when the

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-09-24 Thread Dave Cramer
Ya, I was under that impression as well. Dave Cramer On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 18:18, Renee wrote: > I was under the impression that both terms were being deprecated. Is that > only the case when they appear in tandem? > > > On Sep 24, 2019, at 6:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut < > peter.eisentr...@2ndqu

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-09-24 Thread Renee
I was under the impression that both terms were being deprecated. Is that only the case when they appear in tandem? > On Sep 24, 2019, at 6:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut > wrote: > >> On 2019-09-24 21:58, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the webs

Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-09-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-09-24 21:58, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/logical-replication-publication.html > Description: > > I was under the impression we were removing the use of that word from our > d

I'm surprised to see the word master here

2019-09-24 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/logical-replication-publication.html Description: I was under the impression we were removing the use of that word from our docs ?