Thank you, Daniel.
--
Oleg Sibiryakov
On 02.10.2024 15:58, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 2 Oct 2024, at 10:09, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
Thank you for your kind feedback! I will take due note of the comments in the
next documentation patches as well.
I have made all the changes as per your feedb
> On 2 Oct 2024, at 10:09, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Thank you for your kind feedback! I will take due note of the comments in the
> next documentation patches as well.
>
> I have made all the changes as per your feedback and also corrected paragraph
> reflow.
>
> The third version of the pa
01.10.2024 11:59, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 1 Oct 2024, at 10:04, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
Here is a kind reminder of a small documentation improvement patch, which we
started discussing a month ago.
I removed all the controversial points touched upon in this thread. Please,
take a look once
Dear all,
Here is a kind reminder of a small documentation improvement patch,
which we started discussing a month ago.
I removed all the controversial points touched upon in this thread.
Please, take a look once again at your convenience.
The patch shall be applied to the master branch
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 10:04, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
> Here is a kind reminder of a small documentation improvement patch, which we
> started discussing a month ago.
>
> I removed all the controversial points touched upon in this thread. Please,
> take a look once again at you
Here is a patch without the builtin/built-in corrections (find attached).
But I still believe the issue should be discussed further.
We actually have two options: it is either a spelling mistake (since
built-in should written with a hyphen), or we miss the tag
(since it is actually also a valu
On 10.09.24 15:02, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 10 Sep 2024, at 13:46, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
1. Since we do not want to use here, I suggest we hyphenate it as
"built-in". What's your take on it?
I think that's the right choice given the hyphenation used in the rest of the
docs. There are
> On 10 Sep 2024, at 13:46, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
> 1. Since we do not want to use here, I suggest we hyphenate it as
> "built-in". What's your take on it?
I think that's the right choice given the hyphenation used in the rest of the
docs. There are a few more places on that same page which
Thank you for your feedback.
1. Since we do not want to use here, I suggest we hyphenate it
as "built-in". What's your take on it?
2. Leaving not-null is fine.
--
Oleg Sibiryakov
On 06.09.2024 16:20, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 5 Sep 2024, at 11:33, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
Dear all,
I have
> On 5 Sep 2024, at 11:33, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> I have prepared a patch containing some minor inconsistencies in the
> documentation. Please, take a look.
> The inconsistencies were noticed by: Ekaterina Kiryanova, Elena Indrupskaya,
> Maxim Yablokov, Anna Uraskova, Elena Kara
Dear all,
I have prepared a patch containing some minor inconsistencies in the
documentation. Please, take a look.
The inconsistencies were noticed by: Ekaterina Kiryanova, Elena
Indrupskaya, Maxim Yablokov, Anna Uraskova, Elena Karavaeva, and me.
We will be looking forward to your feedback
11 matches
Mail list logo
