Re: Cleanup of syntax.sgml

2025-06-20 Thread David G. Johnston
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 2:21 PM Joshua Drake wrote: > > >> "We advise users who to read this chapter carefully ..." ? botched >> surgery on this one >> > > Not sure what you mean here? I reviewed the source sgml (that I modified): > > We advise users who to read this chapter carefully because it

Re: Cleanup of syntax.sgml

2025-06-20 Thread Joshua Drake
> > Overall I'm good with the attempt to trim, and most of the changes, but > feel it tries to hard and ends up being to "matter-of-fact"; the > conjunctions that exist make reading a wall of text easier. I agree that > some of them could be removed as being more judgemental than mechanical. > Fa

Re: Cleanup of syntax.sgml

2025-06-20 Thread David G. Johnston
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:33 PM Joshua Drake wrote: > To make it more consumable. > Overall I'm good with the attempt to trim, and most of the changes, but feel it tries to hard and ends up being to "matter-of-fact"; the conjunctions that exist make reading a wall of text easier. I agree that

Cleanup of syntax.sgml

2025-06-20 Thread Joshua Drake
To make it more consumable. -- - Founder - https://commandprompt.com/ - 24x7x365 Postgres since 1997 - Founder and Co-Chair - https://postgresconf.org/ - Founder - https://postgresql.us - United States PostgreSQL - Public speaker, published author, postgresql expert, and people be