Re: "System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-24 Thread Jürgen Purtz
On 24.08.2018 02:21, Michael Paquier wrote: On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:53:35AM +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote: This inconsistency is part of the more general problem that we miss a chapter, where our basic terms like 'database', 'cluster', 'segment', 'catalog', 'schema', ... are explicitly defined.

Re: "System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:53:35AM +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > This inconsistency is part of the more general problem that we miss a > chapter, where our basic terms like 'database', 'cluster', 'segment', > 'catalog', 'schema', ... are explicitly defined. You may have a point here, not in the way

Re: "System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 3:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have noticed that psql documentation mentions "system roles", however > in all other parts of the docs, we use the term "default roles". > Shouldn't we make this term more consistent and also add a link to the > table descr

Re: "System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Jürgen Purtz
This inconsistency is part of the more general problem that we miss a chapter, where our basic terms like 'database', 'cluster', 'segment', 'catalog', 'schema', ... are explicitly defined. Kind regards Jürgen Purtz

"System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, I have noticed that psql documentation mentions "system roles", however in all other parts of the docs, we use the term "default roles". Shouldn't we make this term more consistent and also add a link to the table describing those roles? Please see the attached. Thanks, -- Michael diff -