On 12/17/24 07:40, Egor Rogov wrote:
> On 16.12.2024 21:24, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> On 12/9/24 19:54, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> On 12/8/24 16:00, Egor Rogov wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I've spotted a
On 12/9/24 19:54, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 12/8/24 16:00, Egor Rogov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I've spotted another mention of B-tree being the only AM that supports
>> parallel builds: comment in src/backend/catalog/index.c. As this mention
>>
27;ve spotted another mention of B-tree being the only AM that supports
> parallel builds: comment in src/backend/catalog/index.c. As this mention
> is not visible to the users, I'd propose removing it altogether rather
> than fixing it. Updated patch is attached.
>
Thanks for noticing this and the patches. You're right, this should have
been updated with the BRIN parallel builds. I'll get this committed
sometime the week.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
com>>
> Date: Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 1:03 AM
> Subject: Fwd: GROUP BY DISTINCT
> To: <mailto:pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: *Tomas Vondra* <mailto:tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:31:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:03:54PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:20:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, people normally list things in defined order, so you would usually
> not list them in non-d
tion (one country uses text, another number, ...).
I do however agree that had there been such definition, it's probably
natural to list columns in the same order. We know the order is not
important, the proposed patch states that explicitly, but this just
feels natural.
regards
--
Tomas Vondr
, though. It might be better to point
out the order may not exactly match CREATE STATISTICS, and point users to
what e.g. "\d" shows (because that will show the order as stored in the
system catalog).
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
