> I've been whacking this around for the better part of the afternoon and
> came up with the attached. I think it is correct, and better than my
> previous proposal, but possibly need more polish. Comments welcome.
FWIW it looks good to me!
Steve.
This email is confidential. If you are not the
> All good stuff. I will try to take this into account and submit an
> actual proposed patch -- hopefully over this weekend.
Thanks.
> We *just* very recently added the ability to add images. Not sure I want
> to attempt creating one for this, but perhaps after I write the patch
> you could give
> Additionally s/INHERITS/INHERIT/
Good spot.
> The wording should be something like
>
> 8<---
> The specified role_name must be a role that the current session user is
> a member of directly or indirectly.
> 8<---
That’s certainly much better (perhaps with a comma after “of”, i
