05.12.2018 4:04, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 01:24:22AM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
Yeah, I think the notion *remote_flush level* is more appropriate especially
in the context of sync replication. Within this context maybe it makes sense
to replace the word *level* to
sense to replace the word *level* to *value* in description of
*flush_lag*?
--
Regards,
Maksim Milyutin
*on*.
Small patch is attached.
--
Regards, Maksim Milyutin
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
index 4164d84..33869be 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
@@ -1856,7 +1856,7 @@ SELECT pid, wait_event_type, wait_event FROM
by the definition of *checkpoint_warning* parameter,
namely the phrase "caused by the filling of checkpoint segment files". I
think the word "checkpoint" is unnecessary here. I tried to rephrase
this definition in fix_checkpoint_warning_definition_doc.patch.
--
Regards,
M