Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader

2018-01-29 Thread Jim Ryan
This looks great. Thanks for working on it. Jim On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:35:09AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > On Friday, January 26, 2018, Jim Ryan wrote: > > > > Hey Bruce, > > > >

Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader

2018-01-26 Thread Jim Ryan
Hey Bruce, Thanks for working on this, but wouldn't pg_upgrade be needed from 10.1 to 10.2? Aren't those considered major versions, or am I misunderstanding? The source of my (and potentially others) confusion is if from 9.1 to 9.2 is considered a major version change or not. I think most users

Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader

2018-01-26 Thread Jim Ryan
versioning change outside the scope of these docs? If so, then perhaps a link to the versioning policy would work? Jim On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:04:17PM -0500, Jim Ryan wrote: > > Hey Bruce, > > > > Thanks for working