"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Sunday, August 10, 2025, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Possibly we should reword the tutorial intro a bit, to the effect
>> that you can follow along with the examples if you have a source
>> tree at hand. (Sadly, that's not going to be very many novices
>> these days.)
>
On Sunday, August 10, 2025, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
> Possibly we should reword the tutorial intro a bit, to the effect
> that you can follow along with the examples if you have a source
> tree at hand. (Sadly, that's not going to be very many novices
> these days.)
>
I’d rather remove it from the d
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> Well, the main issue is the people who write the documentation and code the
> software only directly support installing it from source code. Third-party
> packagers take over when it comes to producing binaries. You would need to
> convince them to change their ways
On Sunday, August 10, 2025, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
>
> Fix it so that access to the tutorial (since you have it) becomes
> convenient
> for ALL people with sources, binaries, installers, archives and any other
> supplies.
>
Well, the main issue is the people who write the documentation and
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/tutorial-sql-intro.html
Description:
Hi!
I am in the process of studying your DBMS. And everything was fine with me
until the moment when the tutorial in Chapter 2.1, which is proposed nee
