On Friday, July 19, 2024 1:13 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The documentation incorrectly stated that users cannot alter subscription's
> failover option when two-phase commit is enabled.
>
> When writing this doc, I only wanted to mention we cannot execute ALTER SUB
> SET
> (fail
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:05 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:10 PM Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> >> Not sure that this is worth changing. The examples work OK when taken
> >> in isolation or are able to demonstrate the point they want to show.
> >> I
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:10 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Not sure that this is worth changing. The examples work OK when taken
>> in isolation or are able to demonstrate the point they want to show.
>> In short, not all these queries are here to be compatible with
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:10 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 10:46:04AM +0900, 日向充 wrote:
> > I have found executable examples that do not work correctly
> > in the doc of "SQL Functions Returning Sets" in xfunc.sgml.
> > So I fixed the examples as follows.
>
>
The attached pa
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 10:46:04AM +0900, 日向充 wrote:
> I have found executable examples that do not work correctly
> in the doc of "SQL Functions Returning Sets" in xfunc.sgml.
> So I fixed the examples as follows.
> - Changed CREATE TABLE tab
> '(y int, z int)' to '(x int, y int, z int)'
> - Cha
Hi!
I have found executable examples that do not work correctly
in the doc of "SQL Functions Returning Sets" in xfunc.sgml.
So I fixed the examples as follows.
- Changed CREATE TABLE tab
'(y int, z int)' to '(x int, y int, z int)'
- Changed INSERT INTO tab
'(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6), (7, 8)'
to
On 7/18/24 1:59 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 18 Jul 2024, at 15:49, Tom Lane wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
While not a standard the pilcrow [0] is, AFAICT from a bit of looking at other
docs, commonly used for this. There is a lot of variability though so
whichever we choose it will be
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> Looking a bit closer, the Python documentation does just this, a pilcrow with
> a
> tool-tip ("Link to this heading") when hovering over it
Oh nice --- a precedent! And one that a fair number of people
will have seen before. +1 for copying Python.
> On 18 Jul 2024, at 15:49, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> While not a standard the pilcrow [0] is, AFAICT from a bit of looking at
>> other
>> docs, commonly used for this. There is a lot of variability though so
>> whichever we choose it will be wrong one for someone.
>
>
Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 21:30 +0300, Igor Gnatyuk wrote:
>> Attached you will find new patch version fix_doc_raise_v4.patch,
>> please check it out.
> Thanks. I have marked the patch as "ready for committer".
I fooled with the wording a bit more and pushed it.
Thanks for th
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> While not a standard the pilcrow [0] is, AFAICT from a bit of looking at other
> docs, commonly used for this. There is a lot of variability though so
> whichever we choose it will be wrong one for someone.
I like this suggestion better because that's U+00B6, ie part
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 19:46, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> There is a lot of variability though so
> whichever we choose it will be wrong one for someone.
I think the tooltip would help reduce the chances of someone being
confused. For an example, see [1].
David
[1]
https://devblogs.microsoft.c
Hello
ALTER TABLE documentation writes: "You must own the table to use ALTER TABLE.
To change the schema or tablespace of a table, you must also have CREATE
privilege on the new schema or tablespace. To add the table as a new child of a
parent table, you must own the parent table as well. Also,
> On 18 Jul 2024, at 07:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. I've found this new feature useful multiple times already,
> but the '#' icon is as non-mnemonic and unobvious as could possibly
> be. OTOH, I don't know of a standard icon for this feature.
While not a standard the pilcrow [0] is, AFAICT fro
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 07:40, David Rowley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 17:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah. I've found this new feature useful multiple times already,
> > but the '#' icon is as non-mnemonic and unobvious as could possibly
> > be. OTOH, I don't know of a standard icon for this
15 matches
Mail list logo
