On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 07:19:39PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > The placement in the numbered listing section feels wrong, I am OK with
> > the wording. It should be down in the clause details.
> >
> > FOR lock_strength [ OF from_refe
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 07:19:39PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> The placement in the numbered listing section feels wrong, I am OK with
> the wording. It should be down in the clause details.
>
> FOR lock_strength [ OF from_reference [, ...] ] [ NOWAIT | SKIP LOCKED ] --
> need to change th
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 7:04 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 03:44:04PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > I don't like this particular solution to the stated complaint. When a
> FROM
> > entry has an alias it must be referenced via that alias anywhere it is
> > referenced in
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 03:44:04PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> I don't like this particular solution to the stated complaint. When a FROM
> entry has an alias it must be referenced via that alias anywhere it is
> referenced in the query - and indeed it is an error to not write the alias in
>
On 2023-11-20 08:14 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 19.11.23 21:34, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > * Making explicit references to ISO 8601:2004 where section numbers are
> >referenced. Mostly in source comments but also a couple of places in
> >the docs. This is about avoiding confusion as
