On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:01:45PM -0400, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> On 6/22/23 9:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Michael Paquier writes:
> > > "With multiple decades of development behind it, PostgreSQL.."
> >
> > +1. It sure seems silly trying to automate changing this.
>
> +1. With the proposed langu
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 09:16:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 06:38:37PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> >> Quote:
> >> "<...>When a transaction uses this isolation level, a SELECT query (without
> >> a FOR UPDATE/SHARE clause) sees only data co
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 06:38:37PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> Quote:
>> "<...>When a transaction uses this isolation level, a SELECT query (without
>> a FOR UPDATE/SHARE clause) sees only data committed before the query began;
>> it never sees either uncommitted
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 06:38:37PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/transaction-iso.html
> Description:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/transaction-iso.html#XACT-READ-C
On 6/14/23 11:36, PG Doc comments form wrote:
In Slack, it seems clear that this is a "well known issue" to some people on
the project, but it continues to burn people in the wild.
This seems important enough that it should be included in the official
docs.
Can I do anything to help get the doc
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/transaction-iso.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/transaction-iso.html#XACT-READ-COMMITTED
Quote:
"<...>When a transaction uses this isolation level, a SELECT quer
