Magnus Hagander writes:
> It might be worth splitting that part into one section with the
> current function (lo_create) and then a separate section with the
> backwards-compatible lo_creat function though -- I can see how it's
> easy to come to the conclusion you did from reading it, and that cou
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 1:39 PM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/lo-interfaces.html
> Description:
>
> I assume "inv_oid = lo_creat(conn, INV_READ|INV_WRITE);" should be "inv_oid
> = lo_
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/lo-interfaces.html
Description:
I assume "inv_oid = lo_creat(conn, INV_READ|INV_WRITE);" should be "inv_oid
= lo_create(conn, INV_READ|INV_WRITE);", right?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/
