On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, 16:45 Tom Lane, wrote:
>
> No, "memoize" is the intended spelling.
>
> regards, tom lane
Oh, my bad. Cool new term. Thanks.
Erwin Brandstetter writes:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/release-14.html#id-1.11.6.5.5.3.7
>> Add executor method to memoize results from the inner side of a
> nested-loop join (David Rowley)
> ->
> Add executor method to memorize results from the inner side of a
> nested-loop join (David
> On 23 Sep 2021, at 16:26, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/release-14.html#id-1.11.6.5.5.3.7
>
> > Add executor method to memoize results from the inner side of a nested-loop
> > join (David Rowley)
>
> ->
> Add executor method to memorize results from the inn
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/release-14.html#id-1.11.6.5.5.3.7
> Add executor method to memoize results from the inner side of a
nested-loop join (David Rowley)
->
Add executor method to memorize results from the inner side of a
nested-loop join (David Rowley)
Regards
Erwin
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:48:37AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Thanks, and +1 from me.
maintenance_work_mem would be used in the context of autovacuum if
autovacuum_work_mem is -1, but it seems to me that the suggested
wording sounds like only autovacuum_work_mem is used and that it would
never f
On Wed, 2021-09-22 at 17:45 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, at 10:40 AM, nikolai.berkoff wrote:
> > Yes that reads better still.
> I'm attaching a patch with Laurenz's words.
Thanks, and +1 from me.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
