On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 01:24:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.06.21 18:29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:48:25PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021, 12:28 PG Doc comments form
> > > You are correct. I don't see an urgent need to spend time
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 04:06:38PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > + As a safety device, an aggressive vacuum scan will
> > + occur for any table whose multixact-age (see > + linkend="vacuum-for-multixact-wraparound"/>) is greater than > +
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 07:11:15PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/transaction-iso.html
> Description:
>
> 13.2.1. Read Committed Isolation Level
> Read Committed is the default i
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/transaction-iso.html
Description:
13.2.1. Read Committed Isolation Level
Read Committed is the default isolation level in PostgreSQL. When a
transaction uses this isolation level, a SELECT
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 05:15:23AM +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:01:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >Only the first mention of "factorial()" uses a link; the second item
> >doesn't have any link.
>
> There are other places as well, like this on:
> "The pos
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021, at 11:01 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>
>> I have avoided doing that since the link is about the roles, not about
>> the term "predefined roles".
>
> I tend to agree that it’s about the roles, but it isn’t about just one of
> them …
I think it is clear that "predefined roles" l
