PG Doc comments form writes:
> Currently the documentation reads:
> This option is only meaningful for the plain-text format.
> This statement is imprecise.
Yeah, I agree --- it's not clear whether the option is ignored or
rejected. Explicitly saying it's ignored is an improvement.
> Would be
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:01 AM Michael Vastola wrote:
>
> Crap. Meant to include link.
>
> See
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-string.html#id-1.5.8.10.7.2.2.28.1.1.1
>
> On 1/12/21 10:59 PM, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged o
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/app-pgdump.html
Description:
Currently the documentation reads:
This option is only meaningful for the plain-text format.
This statement is imprecise. Actually the cownership has nothin
Crap. Meant to include link.
See
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-string.html#id-1.5.8.10.7.2.2.28.1.1.1
On 1/12/21 10:59 PM, PG Doc comments form wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/functions-st
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/functions-string.html
Description:
Hi,
*Really* tiny issue, but the two the functions listed here have unbalanced
parenthesis. (Obviously this is super low priority.)
Best,
Mike
