On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 02:30:55PM +0100, Robin Abbi wrote:
> PostgreSQL went as far as release 10 without procedures.
> Some third party resources written before 11 loosely conflate procedures with
> functions.
> Some third party resources written before 11 accurately state PostgreSQL has
> functi
PostgreSQL went as far as release 10 without procedures.
Some third party resources written before 11 loosely conflate procedures
with functions.
Some third party resources written before 11 accurately state PostgreSQL
has functions but not procedures.
Referring to the PostgreSQL docs for 11 on, pr
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 20:18, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:33:49AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/sql-createprocedure.html
> > Description:
> >
> > The
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:18 AM Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>
> > Why?
>
> Because it can hinder the learning process.
FWIW I'd at least fixup comment.sgml to reference a current type. And
while in there might as well add missing examples for the following since
we seem to have a goal of providing one
Why?
Because it can hinder the learning process. And it's possible that
people ignore or forget about the warning message, but are confused
somewhat later that commands like \d shows GiST instead of RTREE.
It's not hurting anything to continue the substitution in CREATE
INDEX.
Yes, it's
