Re: Client parameter list omits timezone

2020-07-26 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, Please don't top-post on these lists. * Kevin Burke (ke...@meter.com) wrote: > I guess my broader issue is that it's hard to figure out how to configure > things like the timezone in a given client. Generally, you pass some things > as parameters in the connection string but it's not o

Re: Client parameter list omits timezone

2020-07-26 Thread Kevin Burke
I guess my broader issue is that it's hard to figure out how to configure things like the timezone in a given client. Generally, you pass some things as parameters in the connection string but it's not obvious which values are accepted or where to pass them, unless you go rooting around in the prot

Please ignore my last message

2020-07-26 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/tutorial-fk.html Description: It was my mistake, please ignore it. Sorry I don't know how to recall

Potential Error

2020-07-26 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/tutorial-fk.html Description: Hello Thank you for your great tutorial. I wasn't able to compile the below without a 'not null' after the primary key word: https://www.postgresql.org/doc

Re: Client parameter list omits timezone

2020-07-26 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * PG Doc comments form (nore...@postgresql.org) wrote: > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/libpq-connect.html > Description: > > I am looking for a complete list of parameters that I can pass in the > "connect"/"open database connection" list on the client (in this case, > githu

Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix

2020-07-26 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Oops. Forgot to attach the patch. > In the table no bull mark is in "No conflict resolution necessary" row > for pgpool-II. Actually this is wrong. Pgpool-II does not need > conflict resolution. > > Also in the same page "Pgpool-II has this capability." (here "this" > means "Multiple-Server Paral

High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix

2020-07-26 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
In the table no bull mark is in "No conflict resolution necessary" row for pgpool-II. Actually this is wrong. Pgpool-II does not need conflict resolution. Also in the same page "Pgpool-II has this capability." (here "this" means "Multiple-Server Parallel Query Execution") This used to be true long