On 2020-May-06, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> I know that 9.6 uses a different subset of the styles, and I recall the
> text being blue during the original conversion. For example, the "table"
> in the 9.6 docs has a class of "CALSTABLE" whereas in master, it is
> "table" (and we operate off of it as
On 5/6/20 5:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hello
>
> I think the recent changes to CSS might have broken things in the XSLT
> build; apparently the SGML tooling did things differently. Compare the
> screenshot of tables 67.2 and 67.3 ... 9.6 on the left, master on the
> right. Is the latter form
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 18:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Thom Brown writes:
> > I noticed that the tables on JSON functions and operators page in
> > devel aren't rendering correctly.
>
> What do you think isn't correct? We're in process of changing the
> design for function/operator tables, so it's cer
Thom Brown writes:
> I noticed that the tables on JSON functions and operators page in
> devel aren't rendering correctly.
What do you think isn't correct? We're in process of changing the
design for function/operator tables, so it's certainly *different*
from the way it's looked in the past, bu
Hi,
I noticed that the tables on JSON functions and operators page in
devel aren't rendering correctly.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-json.html#FUNCTIONS-JSON-PROCESSING
--
Thom
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:49 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 07:06:55PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I see how that can be pretty useful for something that's as simple as
> asciidoc.
> > But I wonder how useful it would be for our docbook documentation.
> >
> > There'd be no
On 06.05.20 00:01, Tom Lane wrote:
I don't deny that we have a problem here: in the website rendering,
that text tends to be pushed down out of sight by the chapter's
sub-table-of-contents. But that issue exists for every chapter
that's got more than a couple of sections. We shouldn't hack
arou
